POLICY

SCB Policy Priorities:

Policy Tools and Guidelines for SCB Members

  • Overview of SCB
    Policy Approval Process
  • Strategic Goals

    SCB Policy Committee

    Section Policy Pages

    Archived News Items

    Contact SCB's Policy Director

    Get The Latest
    Announcements, Alerts
    & Information in
    your Inbox!

    Join SCB's
    Policy Listserve
    !

    An overview of SCB's Policy Approval Process is available here.

    After reviewing the policy page and resources, one of the most effective ways you can bring science to policymakers is to establish relationships with your government officials wherever you are.

    In the U.S., for example, citizens can get to know their Senators, Members of Congress and agency officials working on issues they care about most. Under "Policy Tools and Guidelines for SCB Members" on the navigation bar to the left, we have web sites for offices and research reports to help guide you through the international and U.S. federal policy ecosystems. U.S. SCB members may also want to call the Capitol Operator at 202-225-3121, and ask to be connected to the offices of your House Members and Senators and Committees of interest.

    Welcome to the Society for Conservation Biology Policy web site.

    The goal of the Society is to bring vital science to those making policy decisions helping them make sound judgments when creating policy.

    Policy News:


    Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Established -- May 8, 2012

    On April 21, 2012, after nearly decade of negotiations, more than 90 nations from around the world agreed to establish an Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES).  IPBES will likely function similarly to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) by providing a government-supported interface between the scientific community and policy makers regarding issues surrounding the protection of biodiversity and ecosystem services, and by building capacity for and strengthen the use of science in policy making.  This will be the first global mechanism that brings information regarding biodiversity and ecosystem services together, synthesizes that information, and provides analyses of that information for decision makers.    SCB has been an active participant and contributor to many of the negotiations focusing on the establishment of IPBES for many years.  For the meeting in Panama in April, SCB sent a four person delegation led by Bengt-Gunnar “Bege” Jonsson from Sweden, accompanied by Carolyn Lundquist from New Zealand, Olivier Chassot from Costa Rica, and Brett Hartl from the D.C. policy office.

    • A full recap of the Panama meeting, as well as an analysis of what the establishment of IPBES means for SCB can be found HERE.
    • The full press release from the United Nations Environmental Program, with a statement by Carolyn Lundquist from SCB, regarding the establishment of IPBES can be found HERE.
    • Additional information on IPBES can be found HERE.
    • Read SCB's Position Paper for the April 2012 meeting

    SCB and Allies Urge Federal Agencies to Apply Wildlife Laws to Help Restore Damage Done by Deepwater Horizon Spill-- April 20, 2012

    Today marks the second anniversary of the largest oil spill in US history. As the Deepwater Horizon well spewed oil for weeks into the Gulf of Mexico it created a series of lethal and degrading effects upon federally-protected wildlife and birds, which would normally be violations of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and other federal laws. Yet it appears that the Department of Justice has not filed a civil or criminal complaint seeking fines or other relief for the apparent violations of the ESA and other federal wildlife laws.

    SCB, The Wildlife Society (TWS), The Ornithological Council, and The Society for Ecological Restoration (SER), in a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder, USFWS Director Dan Ashe and NOAA Administrator Jane Lubchenco, urge one or more complaints be filed and fines levied for each of the documented and scientifically probable takes that resulted from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The signatories emphasize that a strong deterrent is needed to assure that the Deepwater Horizon parties and other oil companies refrain from such conduct in the future. The impacts of the spill on protected birds, mammals and sea life will persist far into the future and could require hundreds of millions of dollars or more in restoration to correct the damage.

         >> Read the letter here


    Request for Environmental Impact Statement of Proposed Active Forest Management in Spotted Owl Critical Habitat -- April 2, 2012

    Calling for continued science-based protection for threatened northern spotted owls, the Society for Conservation Biology, The Wildlife Society, and the American Ornithologists’ Union joined together today in asking the Department of the Interior (DOI) to reconsider its proposal for commercial timber harvesting in the Pacific Northwest.

    In a letter to DOI Secretary Ken Salazar, SCB, TWS, and AOU called for a full environmental impact statement (EIS) and peer-reviewed scientific assessment on the potential impacts of a DOI proposal that would allow substantial commercial timber harvesting in the critical habitat of threatened northern spotted owls in the Pacific Northwest.  The societies are recommending that the EIS identify a range of experimental forestry techniques, appropriate scientific methodologies to assess those techniques, and a scientific process for evaluating impacts on northern spotted owls. 

      Read the letter to Secretary Salazar HERE

      Read the press release that calls for a full EIS HERE


    SCB Comments on Problematic Proposal "On Significant Portion of Its Range"; Offers Alternative to Prevent Weakening the Impact of the Endangered Species Act -- March 8, 2012

    Today, the Society for Conservation Biology submitted extensive comments to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service regarding the Services’ draft policy defining the phrase “significant portion of its range.”  Because the U.S. Endangered Species Act allows the Services to list species as threatened or endangered based on threats “throughout all or a significant portion” of a species’ range, it is critically important that this definition be based on the best available scientific research in order to effectively conserve biodiversity.

    SCB outlined several areas where the Services’ draft policy appears to ignore several key principles from the field of conservation biology.  Most importantly, the policy appears to ignore the basic purpose of the ESA, which clearly envisions protecting declining species, and the ecosystems on which they depend, before they become threatened or endangered with extinction globally, and to restore such threatened species that have been extirpated from significant portions of their historic range. 

    The comments were approved by the Society’s global Policy Committee, which includes conservation scientists and other experts in a wide range of the sciences and law, and filed on behalf of the Society’s North America and Marine Sections.

    The text of SCB’s comments can be found HERE.

    Background provided by the Fish and Wildlife Service on the Services’ draft policy can be found HERE.

    A critique of the Services’ draft policy by the House Natural Resources Committee’s ranking minority member can be found HERE


    SCB to Ask the President of Brazil to Veto Forest Code Amendments -- February 29, 2012

    The Presidents of the Society for Conservation Biology and its ANA (Latin America and the Caribbean) Section delivered a letter and a formal resolution to Brazil President Dilma Rousseff asking her to veto amendments to the Brazilian Forest Code that would weaken measures in place since 1965 that protect against deforestation in the Amazon.

    The bill, passed by Brazil’s senate, would amend a 47-year-old forest code that restricted the amount of land farmers could clear. Until recent years the code was not well enforced. When enforcement of the Forest Code increased under former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, powerful agricultural interests in Brazil began work to loosen restrictions in the code. Now, under the bill that is expected to come before new president Dilma Rousseff in March, farmers who would have been required to reforest 55m hectares of land illegally cleared prior to 2008, will only be required to reforest 24m hectares, and farmers who own up to 1,087 hectares would not have to pay penalties for land illegally cleared prior to 2008. The updated code would also change restrictions on clearing trees from riverbanks and hillsides as buffer zones, which would be calculated according to dry-season river flows, dramatically reducing the size of the buffer zones in many cases. Loopholes in the bill could also allow landholders in some states to reduce in other ways the amount of forest cover required by current law.

    Supporters of the bill, overwhelmingly from the small but powerful agricultural sector, say it reduces regulatory burdens on small farmers, simplifies an overly complicated and confusing forest code that has been amended numerous times since 1965, and will ultimately lead to less deforestation by legalizing properties lacking land titles, thus making it easier to track illegal clearing. 

    A poll conducted last May on the Forest Code highlights the power of agricultural interests in Brazil’s Congress, as the majority of Brazilians, 85 percent according to the poll, say forests and rivers should take priority over agricultural production. This popular support for conservation of the Amazon has translated into undeniable progress in Brazil in recent years to protect the world’s largest rain forest. A government report released in December showed that deforestation in the Amazon is at its lowest level since satellite tracking began.


    Federal Budget Request for Wildlife Conservation: Not keeping up with numbers in need-- February 13, 2012

    WASHINGTON – Today, the White House released the President's budget for Fiscal Year 2013, outlining the administration's priorities for the coming fiscal year which begins in October. Passing the Federal budget each year represents one of the primary ways that Congress is able to influence how biodiversity is protected within the United States. The first step in this process occurs when the President releases his budget. Read the full article here >> 


    SCB to Interior: "Enhance Wolf Protection in Natural Dispersal Corridors, Do Not Rely on Human Transport In Wyoming Wolf Delisting Rule"-- January 13, 2012

    Read SCB's comments here

    SCB Proposes Win-Win Solutions for More Open Access to Publications and Data and for Scientific Societies as Publishers -- January 12, 2012


    SCB Among the Leaders of the Scientific Community In Developing An Intergovernmental Science - Policy Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)

    Our SCB team leader writes--

    "...[C]omments on the UNEP documents (Programme of Work and Rules of Procedure) have been posted on the IPBES home page (www.ipbes.net). There you can see our response in relation to a number of governments and other stakeholder organizations."

    SCB is preparing to participate in a second session of organizing the panel in Panama in April 2012 so that scientific societies can take part in IPBES and bring the best possible scientific knowledge to international and other policy-makers.

     

    SCB Policy NewsSCB Policy News

    American Institute of Biological Sciences Policy Reports

     

     

    ip = 0