Society for Conservation Biology: 2002 Annual Meeting
Abstracts
< Go Back
Society for Conservation Biology: 2002 Annual Meeting
|
|
Society for Conservation Biology 16th Annual Meeting July 14-July 19 2002
co-hosted by DICE and the British Ecological Society
Abstracts for Conservation and Birds
Session Two
Wednesday 17th
July, 13.30 - 15.00, Eliot Lecture Theatre 2
Chair: Glen Chilton
|
(BLOCK CAPITALS indicate the presenting author)
13.30 - 13.45
CHILTON, GLEN. Department of Biology, St. Mary’s College, 14500 Bannister Road,
S.E., Calgary, Alberta, T2X 1Z4, Canada, <glen.chilton@stmc.ab.ca>.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE LONG-EXTINCT LABRADOR DUCK
If current management practices are to be successful, they should be based on a thorough
understanding of the causes of past population declines and extinctions. The Labrador
Duck bred in remote localities, and went extinct before much was known of its natural
history. Even so, a thorough, critical examination of the literature has provided
some important insights. There is no evidence that this bird or its eggs were harvested
on its breeding grounds. Harvest on the wintering ground was likely to have had only
a minor impact on its population dynamics. The only description of a nest, from Blanc
Sablon, Labrador by Audubon, is likely an error. However, eggs in collections suggest
that this species may have bred in even more remote situations, including western
Greenland and in far northwestern Canada on the Beaufort Sea. We must therefore examine
possible causes of decline in this species that are unrelated to human activities.
13.45 - 14.00
CAMPBELL, STEVEN P., Jack W. Witham, Malcolm L. Hunter, Jr., and Malcolm T. Jones.
Department of Wildlife Ecology, 5755 Nutting Hall, University of Maine, Orono, ME
04469, USA, <Steve_Campbell@umenfa.maine.edu>.
LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF A GROUP-SELECTION TIMBER HARVEST ON THE BIRD COMMUNITY OF AN
OAK-PINE FOREST IN MAINE
Much of the attention on population declines of Neotropical migrant birds has focused
on the effects of clear-cutting and the attendant effects of fragmentation, but few
studies have examined the effects of forest management practices that create small
interior openings in a forest (i.e., group-selection harvests). At the Holt Research
Forest in Arrowsic, Maine we have documented the effects of this type of harvest
on bird abundance for 18 years (5 years pre-harvest and 13 years post-harvest). Abundances
of all bird species in the 40 ha study area were determined by territory maps based
on 16 visits in each breeding season. Of the 38 species of breeding birds abundant
enough for analysis, only six showed a significant response to the timber harvest.
The abundances of Ovenbird and Black-throated Green Warbler decreased in the harvested
areas, while those of White-throated Sparrow, Common Yellowthroat, and Eastern Wood-Pewee
increased in these areas. Notably, the Winter Wren which was previously absent from
the forest appeared in harvested areas immediately following the harvest, apparently
in response to remnant slash piles; subsequently it declined and disappeared. We
conclude that group-selection harvesting favours gap species and disfavours a few
forest species, while most species show little effect.
14.00 - 14.15
MULWA, RONALD, Leon Bennun and Callistus Ogol, Department of Ornithology, National
Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box, 40658 Nairobi, Kenya, <kbirds@africaonline.co.ke>
(RM), Zoology Department, Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844 Nairobi, Kenya (CO),
BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge CB3 ONA, UK (LAB).
CONSERVATION STATUS OF TAITA WHITE-EYE IN THE FRAGMENTED TAITA HILLS FORESTS, KENYA
Taita White-eye, Zosterops (poliogaster) silvanus, is an Endangered bird species
endemic to the highly fragmented forests of the Taita Hills and Mount Kasigau in
south-east Kenya. Between November 1998 and September 1999 we counted Taita White-eyes
along line transects (119 in total, covering 56.3 km) to establish current population
status and distribution in their entire range. Censuses were conducted in all ten
Taita Hills forest fragments where the birds occurred and the little-disturbed Mt
Kasigau forest, some 50 kilometres south-east. The total global population of Taita
White-eyes was estimated to be c. 7,100 birds. Mt Kasigau was the species’ main stronghold,
holding 80% of the entire population at the high density of 26 birds/ha. In the Taita
Hills, white-eye densities were consistently higher in the small than in the large
fragments, but the small fragments held only three percent of the total population.
It is not known if there is current population interchange between the Taita Hills
and Mt Kasigau, which are separated by an extensive tract of unsuitable, semi-arid
habitat.
14.15 - 14.30
TEJEDA-CRUZ, CESAR and William J. Sutherland. Centre for Ecology, Evolution and
Conservation, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK, <Cesar.Tejeda-Cruz@uea.ac.uk>.
BIRD DIVERSITY IN COFFEE SYSTEMS: MIGRANT VS. FOREST SPECIES
Transformation of undisturbed tropical forest to an agricultural mosaic has meant
the local disappearance, fragmentation and isolation of natural habitats. However,
structurally complex production systems, such as coffee, might play an important
role for biodiversity conservation. This has resulted in the promotion of "biodiversity
friendly" coffee. This study aimed to analyse the role of coffee plantations
in bird diversity conservation in southern Mexico. We conducted 245 bird point counts
in five habitats. Tropical rainforest and rustic coffee, which uses native tree shade,
held similar high diversity levels. Shaded monoculture, coffee planted under a specialised
shade dominated by Inga trees, showed slightly lower diversity levels. Cloud
forest held considerably less diversity. Finally, sun coffee, with no tree shade,
had very low diversity. Both shaded coffee systems showed high richness and significantly
higher abundances of migratory birds species. However, cloud forest and tropical
rainforest held higher numbers and significantly higher abundances of sensitive and
indicator species. Thus shaded coffee is important for migratory species and may
play an important role maintaining local biodiversity, but may be detrimental for
forest specialists. Semi-structured interviews with local farmers showed that there
is a tendency to transform forest into coffee when prices rise.
14.30 - 14.45
BORKHATARIA, RENA R., J. Collazo, and M. Groom. Program in Ecology, Duke University,
Durham, NC, 27708 <rrb8@duke.edu> (RRB), North
Carolina Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, North Carolina State University,
Raleigh, NC 27695 (RRB, JC) and Dept of Zoology, University of Washington, Seattle,
WA 98195-1800 (MG)
ECOLOGICAL AND POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS OF CONVERSION FROM SHADE TO SUN COFFEE IN PUERTO
RICO
Biodiversity is greater in shaded coffee plantations than in sun plantations, yet
many farmers are converting to sun for short-term economic gains. The environmental
costs of sun coffee farming and farmers’ opinions have received little attention
from local policy-makers. We used an integrative approach to determine reasons for
coffee conversion in Puerto Rico and ecological services lost to farmers by conversion.
By sampling birds, lizards, and insects in 3 sun and 3 shade coffee farms and using
exclosures, we determined that insectivorous birds are more abundant in shaded coffee
(p=0.002) and may provide a service to farmers by controlling insect outbreaks. A
survey of 100 farmers revealed that the reasons for growing sun coffee were higher
yields, recommendations by agronomists, and governmental incentives. Shade farmers
were more satisfied than sun farmers (p=0.03) and most farmers indicated they would
plant shade trees if provided with incentives. Farmers valued species that provide
services to humans, but through conversion farmers lose valuable ecological services
associated with biodiversity. We conclude that promotion of shade coffee serves the
interests of the government and the coffee growers of Puerto Rico, particularly if
biodiversity is valued equally with the social and economic factors involved in coffee
production.
14.45 - 15.00
Discussion
|