![]()
In this email: 2. Update on work with the Endangered Species Coalition, the National Council for Science and the Environment, and the United States Congress.
SCB’s Policy Director
is John Fitzgerald. |
SCB's transition paper [click here for a copy] includes contributions from policy officers of other organizations and senior expert members of SCB contributing their own time. It was edited and cleared by the North American Section leadership and the global Policy Committee. While other scientific societies and supporting organizations ended up submitting their own recommendations, either as part of the conservation groups' recommendations or on their own, the collaborative process of this informal consortium continued a practice that has produced powerful results, such as our joint comments with the Ornithological Council and The Wildlife Society on proposed regulations that would significantly reduce the scope and power of the consultation process under the Endangered Species Act (click here for a copy of the joint comments -- attached to this email.) In order to "leverage" or multiply SCB's influence and in order to learn from our colleagues in other organizations, we participate actively in coalitions and conferences whose work is also designed to advance the science and practice of conserving biodiversity. Two of these produced remarkable sets of recommendations for the new Administration and Congress and we were glad to play significant roles in each.
NCSE also presented the PTT with summaries of their past conference recommendations and that memo is also posted by NCSE. SCB and others strongly suggested as early as May of 2007 that the Congress limit the harvesting or permanent diversion of natural resources of forests, water, and landscapes that are required by the endangered species affected by potentially illegal agency decisions until those decisions could be reviewed and revised. The Inspector General and the Government Accountability Office have issued several reports since then. A few members of Congress belatedly attempted to limit weakening regulations but none seriously stepped in to halt habitat conversions made possible by suspect or irregular decisions. It is clearer with each new report that the economic beneficiaries of the decisions now officially in question may themselves be liable for significant damages and penalties if they are found to have knowingly participated in schemes to use misleading information or material misstatements of fact in these federal proceedings and decisions. Our final recommendation is that the new Attorney General ensure that the enforcement of the laws protecting the environment and the integrity of scientific information in federal decision making receive highest priority. John Fitzgerald
Problems viewing this email? http://www.conbio.org/2008PolicyTransition.cfm |
|
Copyright © 2008 Society for Conservation Biology (SCB).
You are receiveing this email because of your interest in SCB. If you do not wish to receive emails from SCB, please contact HomeOffice@Conbio.org Direct questions, comments, and technical problems to the webmaster SCB is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization |
|